Via Ben Smith of Politico, this amazing ad from "Citizens Against Government Waste," which is the first spot from this campaign season you can imagine people actually remembering a decade from now. "I'm not a witch" might be remembered as a novelty; I think this will be remembered -- like "Morning in America," "Willie Horton," the "Daisy Girl" ad from the 1960s, and perhaps even "3am Phone Call" -- as a notably effective introduction of a new theme. (You don't have to agree with any of these ads to recognize their power.) Watch, marvel, and learn.
CAGW, a descendant of J. Peter Grace's 1980s-era anti-wasteful spending commission, is in principle bipartisan, though in this election its campaign about the menace of "stimulus spending" has an obvious partisan tilt. And if you know anything about the Chinese economy, the actual analytical content here is hilariously wrong. The ad has the Chinese official saying that America collapsed because, in the midst of a recession, it relied on (a) government stimulus spending, (b) big changes in its health care systems, and (c) public intervention in major industries -- all of which of course, have been crucial parts of China's (successful) anti-recession policy.
But never mind! As a work of persuasion and motivation, this commands admiration for its technique. (I'm being serious.) Although I realize that many Chinese people will take offense at it, mainly the chortling section at the end, for me it passes the test for the proper use of "foreign menace" themes in US discourse. Although the ad is clearly meant to make Americans shudder at the idea of a Chinese-dominated future, at no point does it say that the canny foreigners did anything wrong. It uses them as a spur for us to do better -- which, as laid out at length here, is the right way to use foreign comparison. And the stated argument, even from the victorious Chinese professor, is that the Americans erred by turning away from their own values.
In case you're wondering, the banner that appears briefly behind the speaker says "全球经济学," or "Global Economics." I could be wrong, but something about the look of the students -- haircuts, teeth -- makes me doubt that this was actually filmed in China. The main point is, this is the ad of the cycle so far. Now, if these skills could only be applied to helping the public understand real budget and economic tradeoffs once the election is over.
Also: a "reply" from Campus Progress, with the same Chinese narration but somewhat different English subtitles.
![Email this Article]( "Email this Article")
![Add to digg]( "Add to digg")
![Add to Reddit]( "Add to Reddit")
![Add to Twitter]( "Add to Twitter")
![Add to del.icio.us]( "Add to del.icio.us")
![Add to StumbleUpon]( "Add to StumbleUpon")
![Add to Facebook]( "Add to Facebook")
![]()
![]()
![]()
CAGW, a descendant of J. Peter Grace's 1980s-era anti-wasteful spending commission, is in principle bipartisan, though in this election its campaign about the menace of "stimulus spending" has an obvious partisan tilt. And if you know anything about the Chinese economy, the actual analytical content here is hilariously wrong. The ad has the Chinese official saying that America collapsed because, in the midst of a recession, it relied on (a) government stimulus spending, (b) big changes in its health care systems, and (c) public intervention in major industries -- all of which of course, have been crucial parts of China's (successful) anti-recession policy.
But never mind! As a work of persuasion and motivation, this commands admiration for its technique. (I'm being serious.) Although I realize that many Chinese people will take offense at it, mainly the chortling section at the end, for me it passes the test for the proper use of "foreign menace" themes in US discourse. Although the ad is clearly meant to make Americans shudder at the idea of a Chinese-dominated future, at no point does it say that the canny foreigners did anything wrong. It uses them as a spur for us to do better -- which, as laid out at length here, is the right way to use foreign comparison. And the stated argument, even from the victorious Chinese professor, is that the Americans erred by turning away from their own values.
In case you're wondering, the banner that appears briefly behind the speaker says "全球经济学," or "Global Economics." I could be wrong, but something about the look of the students -- haircuts, teeth -- makes me doubt that this was actually filmed in China. The main point is, this is the ad of the cycle so far. Now, if these skills could only be applied to helping the public understand real budget and economic tradeoffs once the election is over.
Also: a "reply" from Campus Progress, with the same Chinese narration but somewhat different English subtitles.
